It is, essentially, a work of ‘history of science’ or, as it would be preferable to express themselves, ‘history of pseudoscience’. So here there is proposed at all to study the Shroud pollen, but to study ‘the study of pollen Shroud’. Therefore below will be made an examination of what has been written and published on the subject ‘pollen Shroud’, bearing in mind always that the opponents of the authenticity is denied access to the source documents: the Shroud of Turin and the same material derived therefrom. Here is a Google translation of an early snippet from The Scam of pollen: Of, course, I would substitute Christian for Catholic (even if I was Catholic). The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false. To the reader who asked why I permit so much negative information about the shroud to appear in this blog, permit me a quote by Thomas Aquinas: It is a paper by Gaetano Ciccone published in June of 2011 at La Sindone di Torino ( ).

The complete file (In Italian, La Sindone di Torino: La truffa dei pollini. Joe Marino kindly sent me, in Google translation, The Shroud of Turin: The scam of pollen. Paper Chase: New Paper on SEM Analysis of Pollen.Breaking News: Sources of DNA on the Shroud of Turin.Recent discussions about pollen on the Shroud of Turin, reflected in three recent postings in this blog… “I regret that, from what I’ve learned from our research, we can not currently use the pollen to define any geographical indication.” - Avinoam Danin*

Shroud of turin dna evidence